The title of this article has been a recurring occurrence over the last 7 years. Ive picked dup a lot of work as an expert in my field with requests generally coming in from past clients who know my quality of work but had to move on for various reasons. I would get...

I Cleaned Up Agency Mistakes
The title of this article has been a recurring occurrence over the last 7 years. Ive picked dup a lot of work as an expert in my field with requests generally coming in from past clients who know my quality of work but had to move on for various reasons.
I would get the call “Shane, I need your help….the agency we hired has messed up and we are not getting leads and our website is broken” that’s the just of the call for help.
The reason I wanted to post this topic was first from shock and disbelief, but second was to help educate business owners who entrust their marketing functions to third party agencies.
I did a bit of work for a previous client (who I left in an amazing state of performance) they provided me everything the agency they hired had done, including invoices and emails they had sent.
The Problem: The client’s website had taken a nosedive in organic rankings and had a bunch of errors on the site. Leads had dropped right off and they were not getting anywhere near breakeven sales from marketing efforts.
This client is in the finance category a very competitive market. They do SEO, paid advertising and email marketing to get leads. The paid advertising they run internally and have no problem with. But they get a large number of leads from SEO.
My job was to take over the SEO work, the web development and maintenance of the website and to also review the reasons that the site went from high performing to crash and burn.

I dislike the large agency model for several reasons. For context, my problem with the agency model needs to be explained.
- Agencies have to make x dollars to cover expenses
- Agencies have big offices in expensive locations
- Agencies have a churn and burn operating model
- Agencies overload the account managers
- Agency account managers are time poor because of their workload
- Time poor account managers cant upskill and learn new skills
- Time poor account managers cant allocate too much time to accounts
- Agencies are very quick to outsource work
- Agencies rarely vet the quality of outsourced work
That’s my main problem with the agency model, having worked in an agency for years, we had just over 300 clients at one point and there was no way the team was properly managing these accounts.
1x account manager had between 30-40 clients
To properly manage their portfolio of account,s the account manager should have between 15-20 accounts under them.
They did not have the time to allocate to each client/
I needed a day to dig through what work had been done, any work requests that the client had sent out so I could understand where the problem started.
Analysing the invoices sent from the agency, I saw line items that made no sense, so let’s break it down.
On each invoice I noticed a pattern
38% of their monthly budget was labeled “communications and emails”.
– Not developing the strategy
– Not content creation.
– Not building links.
– Not website development or fixing errors
Just…emails and calls.
That’s $2,280 of the $6,000 retainer going to account management and not actual work that would improve the performance of the website.
Breaking this down another layer to see what this actually was, in their emails to the client, the agency was
– Sending automated reporting links to the client’s dashboard
– Generic basic task report weekly emails
– Requesting meetings for monthly reporting face time
– Follow-ups to the requests
Nothing actually pushing the needle. No mention of the crashing performance or broken website.
This isn’t isolated to one client, it’s all too familiar when you take over from an agency. Most agencies are rubbish and fluff but there are some smaller one that actually care about their clients and the performance.
I’ve audited and then taken over dozens of projects from big agencies who have dropped the ball. There’s always tell-tale signs that work was shipped out to (no offence) Indian marketing agencies or freelancers from Fiverr.
The kicker is when a large portion of the client’s budget is being spent on administration of the account and not on actual work that will grow the business.
The sad truth of this is that the flashy agency you hire is taking 20-40% of your marketing budget to administer the account, and that leaves 60-70% of the budget to actually do the work.
To add salt to the wound, know that the administration hourly charge out is the exact same rate as the actual work charge rate, even though it’s not actively growing your business.
That’s right—you’re paying premium rates for emails.

How it SHOULD work!
Marketing services that you pay for should look like this:
– Spend 90%+ of your budget on activities that directly impact rankings
– Provide clear, concise updates without nickel-and-diming you
– Show exactly how many hours went to actual SEO work vs. meetings
Several of my agency takeover clients noticed significant improvement in the first 3 months of switching to my services from an agency. All I did was put 90% of that budget to work that helps grow the business and use 10% to cover my costs for the work.
Result? Their organic traffic increased over 300% in just a few months and sales increased as a result.
I would suggest looking at your marketing invoices when you get the next one and really analyse it. I recommend asking the big fat agency to break it down for you so that you can understand what you are really being charged for.
You can ask the following
- What is each line item?
- How are they calculated?
- Are account management and actual work charged at the same rates?
Real marketing progress comes from doing the work, not talking about it.
Put your agency under the microscope.
Recent Comments